mirrors/pikasTech-unidesk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: record CLI closeout friction

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Codex
2026-06-02 06:33:34 +00:00
parent 106348fe79
commit e3f1e726b9
2 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/reference/g14.md
+2
View File
@@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ For HWLAB user-feedback, CLI, Cloud Web, AgentRun, device-pod, public API, or ru
The closing comment for these issues must include the actual command or entry path, target lane or endpoint, relevant trace/session/thread/PipelineRun/run/device ids, and the pass/fail result. If the original entry cannot be verified because rollout has not happened, credentials are unavailable, the target runtime is down, or the required CLI capability is missing, keep the issue open and record the blocker. Do not close the issue on the strength of PR merge, targeted tests, or "will be verified after rollout" wording. If an issue was closed before this real CLI/user-entry validation, reopen it and add a correction comment before continuing.
For HWLAB v0.2 Code Agent context-loss or multi-turn continuity issues, the minimum closeout is a real `hwlab-cli client agent` two-turn E2E from `G14:/root/hwlab-v02` or another approved G14 execution plane with locked runtime namespace/lane env. Submit the first turn, poll its result to completed, submit the second turn with the same explicit `conversationId`/`sessionId`/`threadId`, then capture `trace`/`inspect` evidence. Passing evidence must show the second turn used prior-turn context, and should include context attachment or run reuse labels such as `conversation-context:attached`, `agentrun:run:reused`, `agentrun:runner-job:reused`, plus the relevant run/command ids. Long verification evidence belongs in a separate `gh issue comment create --body-file` comment; lifecycle close comments stay short, as defined in `docs/reference/cli.md`.
`/health/live` revision is owned by `hwlab-cloud-api`; it can legitimately differ from the source commit for a Cloud Web-only change. Do not call that difference a failed Cloud Web rollout when `webAssets.checks.htmlOk`, `webAssets.checks.appJsOk`, CSS probes, Argo health, and `hwlab-cloud-web` Deployment readiness have passed. For Cloud Web behavior changes, the public JS asset probe or a bounded browser/DOM check is stronger evidence than cloud-api `apiRevision`.
Do not turn `v0.2` expansion governance into a stack of broad compatibility gates. The stable control points are branch, dedicated CI/CD source repo, git mirror/relay refs, GitOps branch, namespace, runtime path, Argo Application, FRP ports and generated-output ownership. Legacy DEV/D601/main preflights that block the `v0.2` lane should be removed from that lane, not patched with fallback or legacy modes. Naming, RBAC scope, cleanup policy, resource quota and rollback order are design decisions or runbook entries unless they protect a concrete high-value risk that cannot be enforced by the fixed boundaries above.