feat: expand ci artifact catalog

This commit is contained in:
Codex
2026-05-20 01:20:03 +00:00
parent e0d38d7172
commit 5bb44c9a30
11 changed files with 810 additions and 216 deletions
+65 -14
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# CI/CD Standardization Precheck
# CI/CD Standardization
This document classifies CI/CD paths while UniDesk converges on image-artifact delivery. It is a precheck and guardrail document, not a mass-deletion plan.
This document defines the stable split between CI artifact producers, artifact catalog data, legacy guardrails and CD consumers. Detailed Tekton rules remain in `docs/reference/ci.md`; registry runtime and consumers remain in `docs/reference/artifact-registry.md`; user-service delivery order remains in `docs/reference/user-service-delivery.md`.
## Target Shape
@@ -14,16 +14,66 @@ The standard release shape is:
`backend-core` and D601 `code-queue` may be validated only in dev in this phase. This document must not be used to introduce production deploy validation for either service.
## Artifact Catalog
Root `CI.json` is the CI producer catalog. It is not a deployment manifest.
Allowed catalog data:
- stable `serviceId`;
- artifact `kind`: `source-build` or `upstream-image`;
- producer command: `ci publish-backend-core` or `ci publish-user-service`;
- source repository URL, optional repo root and repo-relative Dockerfile path;
- image repository naming and commit tag policy;
- upstream image digest, upstream source revision and D601 mirror intent for image-only services;
- the required success summary contract.
Forbidden catalog data:
- provider IDs;
- runtime namespace, Compose service, Kubernetes Service or health path;
- ports, environment variables, replicas or volumes;
- desired deployment commits or rollout targets.
Runtime topology belongs to `config.json`, `deploy.json`, existing Kubernetes manifests and the artifact-registry executor.
## Producer Contract
`bun scripts/cli.ts ci publish-user-service --service <id> --commit <full-sha>` reads `source.repo`, `source.dockerfile` and image repository naming from `CI.json`. It rejects command-line repo overrides. Successful source-build producers must label the image with:
- `unidesk.ai/service-id`;
- `unidesk.ai/source-commit`;
- `unidesk.ai/source-repo`;
- `unidesk.ai/dockerfile`.
The successful `artifactSummary` must contain `serviceId`, `sourceCommit`, `sourceRepo`, `dockerfile`, `imageRef`, `tag`, `digest` and `digestRef`.
`blocked` catalog entries must return a structured blocked result. They must not silently skip, build from a dirty worktree, fall back to target-side maintenance deployment, or mutate production.
## Current Coverage
Supported source-build artifact producers:
- `backend-core` through `ci publish-backend-core`;
- `frontend`, `baidu-netdisk`, `decision-center`, `project-manager`, `oa-event-flow`, `todo-note`, `code-queue-mgr`, `findjob`, `pipeline`, `met-nonlinear`, `k3sctl-adapter`, `mdtodo`, `claudeqq` through `ci publish-user-service`.
Cataloged but blocked:
- `code-queue`: source input is known, but this phase allows only dev image validation and not prod-oriented artifact publication.
- `filebrowser` and `filebrowser-d601`: upstream image-only services pinned to `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser@sha256:289c5dd677c56662440f26eeb44266ed9746fe563d2e9100f546bff558534d70`; they need a future upstream mirror producer before CI can publish them.
`code-queue-mgr` is a supported CI producer because the source-build input is known and the remote consumer commit already added a reviewed artifact consumer shape. Its production live apply remains supervisor-gated by deploy/artifact-registry and is not authorized by `CI.json`.
## Upstream Image Consumers
`filebrowser` and `filebrowser-d601` are upstream-image consumers, not source-built UniDesk services.
| Service | Upstream image | Source revision | Catalog home | CI Dockerfile build | Digest / mirror strategy | CD validation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `filebrowser` | `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | `ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472` | `CI.json.upstreamImageConsumers[]` and `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource` | forbidden | resolve tag to `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser@sha256:<manifest-digest>`, then optionally mirror to `127.0.0.1:5000/upstream/filebrowser/filebrowser@sha256:<manifest-digest>` | pull by digest or mirror digest, verify OCI labels, container image id/digest, and private proxy health |
| `filebrowser-d601` | `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | `ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472` | `CI.json.upstreamImageConsumers[]` and `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource` | forbidden | same as `filebrowser` | same as `filebrowser` |
| `filebrowser` | `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | `ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472` | `CI.json.artifacts[]` with `kind=upstream-image` plus `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource` | forbidden | resolve tag to `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser@sha256:<manifest-digest>`, then optionally mirror to `127.0.0.1:5000/upstream/filebrowser/filebrowser@sha256:<manifest-digest>` | pull by digest or mirror digest, verify OCI labels, container image id/digest, and private proxy health |
| `filebrowser-d601` | `docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | `ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472` | `CI.json.artifacts[]` with `kind=upstream-image` plus `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource` | forbidden | same as `filebrowser` | same as `filebrowser` |
The current precheck could inspect the locally cached image labels and image id, but Docker Hub and registry HTTP requests timed out from this container. Therefore the catalog records `digestPin.status=pending-network-verification`; rollout must remain blocked until a reachable registry path resolves the manifest digest and records the mirror digest. The locally cached image shows `org.opencontainers.image.version=2.63.3`, `org.opencontainers.image.revision=ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472`, `linux/amd64`, and image id `sha256:6a4d051140ef9313ad87b443f55ccb1cd6331e7463b4becbec2174b494ea533c`, but a local image id is not a registry digest pin.
The catalog records the resolved upstream digest for the current image. If a future tag refresh cannot resolve the registry manifest digest, rollout must remain blocked until a reachable registry path resolves the manifest digest and records the mirror digest. A local Docker image id is supporting evidence only and not a registry digest pin.
### Upstream Image Evidence
@@ -31,11 +81,10 @@ The catalog expression is intentionally minimal and parseable:
| Evidence command | Required result shape |
| --- | --- |
| `jq '.upstreamImageConsumers[] | {serviceId, upstreamImageRef, digestPin, mirrorStrategy, ciBuild, pullOnlyCdValidation}' CI.json` | both File Browser services show `upstreamImageRef=docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3`, `digestPin.required=true`, `digestPin.status=pending-network-verification`, `mirrorStrategy.mode=mirror-after-digest-verification`, `ciBuild.dockerfileBuild=false`, and `publishCommand=null` |
| `jq '.artifacts[] | select(.kind=="upstream-image") | {serviceId, upstream, status}' CI.json` | both File Browser services show `upstream.imageRef=docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3`, a sha256 `upstream.digestRef`, `sourceRevision=ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472`, mirror intent under `upstream/filebrowser/filebrowser`, and `status=blocked` |
| `bun scripts/cli.ts config show` with the File Browser `artifactSource` projection | both services parse as `kind=upstream-image`, `digestPinRequired=true`, `mirrorRepository=127.0.0.1:5000/upstream/filebrowser/filebrowser`, `ciDockerfileBuild=false`, and `pullOnlyCd=true` |
| `docker image inspect filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | local cache evidence may show the image id and OCI labels for version `2.63.3` and revision `ca5e249e3c0c94159c2136a0cd431a424eb18472`; this is not a registry digest |
| `docker manifest inspect --verbose docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | must resolve an upstream manifest digest before rollout; when the registry request times out, rollout remains blocked and the catalog stays at `pending-network-verification` |
| `bun scripts/cli.ts ci publish-user-service --service filebrowser --commit <full-sha> --dry-run` | returns `ok=false` with the message that File Browser is an upstream image consumer and must not be built by Dockerfile CI |
| `docker manifest inspect --verbose docker.io/filebrowser/filebrowser:v2.63.3` | must resolve the upstream manifest digest before rollout; if the registry request times out, rollout remains blocked |
| `bun scripts/cli.ts ci publish-user-service --service filebrowser --commit <full-sha> --dry-run` | returns `ok=false` with `status=blocked`, upstream digest/mirror metadata, and no Dockerfile source build |
The digest/mirror dry-run contract is:
@@ -70,8 +119,8 @@ Pull-only CD validation must be expressed as concrete checks:
## Guardrails Added
- Upstream-image services are represented in `CI.json.upstreamImageConsumers[]` and in `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource`; they are explicitly outside `CI.json.artifacts[]`.
- `ci publish-user-service` rejects registered `upstream-image` services instead of trying to interpret `repository.dockerfile` as a source Dockerfile.
- Upstream-image services are represented in `CI.json.artifacts[]` with `kind=upstream-image` and in `config.json.microservices[].repository.artifactSource`; they are explicitly outside source-build producers.
- `ci publish-user-service` returns a structured blocked result for registered `upstream-image` services instead of trying to interpret `repository.dockerfile` as a source Dockerfile.
- Local-manifest production deploy for reviewed artifact consumers is blocked before source materialization/build, so prod cannot silently fall back to target-side source build or a dirty worktree.
- `artifact-registry deploy-backend-core` is demoted to a structured deprecated result; backend-core production CD must enter through `deploy apply --env prod`.
@@ -79,7 +128,7 @@ Pull-only CD validation must be expressed as concrete checks:
| Guardrail name / result key | Command evidence | Legacy path covered | Deletion status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `upstream-image` CI publish rejection | `bun scripts/cli.ts ci publish-user-service --service filebrowser --commit <full-sha> --dry-run` returns `ok=false` and says not to build an upstream image consumer | File Browser accidentally entering `CI.json.artifacts[]` or Dockerfile CI | keep; deletion of docker-run repair waits for digest/mirror CD |
| `upstream-image` CI publish rejection | `bun scripts/cli.ts ci publish-user-service --service filebrowser --commit <full-sha> --dry-run` returns `ok=false`, `status=blocked`, and upstream metadata | File Browser accidentally entering Dockerfile CI | keep; deletion of docker-run repair waits for digest/mirror CD |
| `prod-artifact-consumer-local-manifest-blocked` | `bun scripts/cli.ts deploy apply --file deploy.json --service frontend --dry-run` returns `ok=false`, this error key, and points to `deploy apply --env prod --service <service-id> --commit <full-sha>` | prod source-build fallback for reviewed artifact consumers | keep; local manifest mode may still be needed for non-prod/recovery until runbooks are replaced |
| `artifact-registry deploy-backend-core` deprecated result | `bun scripts/cli.ts artifact-registry deploy-backend-core --commit <full-sha>` returns `ok=false`, `deprecated=true`, and replacement `deploy apply --env prod --service backend-core --commit <full-sha>` | backend-core prod CD bypassing deploy reconciler guardrails | keep name only as compatibility until all callers stop using it |
| prod unsupported result for services without artifact consumers | `deploy apply --env prod --service <unsupported-service> --dry-run` must return unsupported instead of falling back to source build | target-side source build/maintenance-channel prod deploy | keep disabled until service-specific artifact consumers exist |
@@ -87,9 +136,11 @@ Pull-only CD validation must be expressed as concrete checks:
The guarded-but-not-deletable paths are: `server rebuild backend-core`, `server rebuild frontend`, `server rebuild baidu-netdisk`, provider-gateway protected upgrade, native k3s bootstrap, k3sctl-adapter bridge repair, File Browser provider-local docker-run repair, and D601 dev/backend target-side rollout. They remain because they are bootstrap, recovery, diagnostic, or controlled dev paths; deleting them requires replacement runbooks or reviewed artifact consumers.
## Not Removed Yet
## Safety Boundary
Bootstrap and repair paths remain because they still protect recovery: native k3s initialization, provider-gateway protected upgrade, k3sctl-adapter control bridge repair, main-server Compose maintenance rebuilds, and File Browser docker-run operations. These paths must be replaced by reviewed artifact consumers or explicit recovery runbooks before deletion.
CI may build images, push to the D601 loopback registry and report immutable digests. CI must not run production CD, call `deploy apply` for production, mutate production namespaces, recreate production Compose services or update `deploy.json`.
backend-core and D601 `code-queue` remain restricted to dev image validation in this phase. Any future production rollout for them must be implemented as an explicit CD consumer change, not as a CI producer side effect.
## Validation Boundary