fix: cool sub2api upstream 400 responses failures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -84,20 +84,24 @@ if (parsed.pool?.defaultTempUnschedulable?.enabled === true) {
|
||||
assertCondition(cloudflare524Keywords.has(keyword), "524 temporary-unschedulable rule must catch Cloudflare timeout wrappers", { keyword, cloudflare524Rule });
|
||||
}
|
||||
const accountState403Rule = rules.find((rule) => rule.statusCode === 403);
|
||||
const clientError400Rule = rules.find((rule) => rule.statusCode === 400);
|
||||
const quota429Rule = rules.find((rule) => rule.statusCode === 429);
|
||||
const successBody200Rule = rules.find((rule) => rule.statusCode === 200);
|
||||
const serviceUnavailable503Rule = rules.find((rule) => rule.statusCode === 503);
|
||||
const accountState403Keywords = new Set((accountState403Rule?.keywords ?? []).map((keyword) => keyword.toLowerCase()));
|
||||
const clientError400Keywords = new Set((clientError400Rule?.keywords ?? []).map((keyword) => keyword.toLowerCase()));
|
||||
const quota429Keywords = new Set((quota429Rule?.keywords ?? []).map((keyword) => keyword.toLowerCase()));
|
||||
const successBody200Keywords = new Set((successBody200Rule?.keywords ?? []).map((keyword) => keyword.toLowerCase()));
|
||||
const serviceUnavailable503Keywords = new Set((serviceUnavailable503Rule?.keywords ?? []).map((keyword) => keyword.toLowerCase()));
|
||||
const accountStatePhrases = ["weekly limit", "less than 10% of your weekly limit left", "run /status for a breakdown"];
|
||||
const successBodyPhrase = "less than 10% of your weekly limit left";
|
||||
for (const keyword of ["invalid_encrypted_content", "encrypted content", "could not be verified", "bad_response_status_code", "暂不支持", "可用模型"]) {
|
||||
assertCondition(clientError400Keywords.has(keyword), "400 temporary-unschedulable rule must catch upstream Responses compatibility and model-routing failures", { keyword, clientError400Rule });
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const accountStatePhrase of accountStatePhrases) {
|
||||
assertCondition(accountState403Keywords.has(accountStatePhrase), "403 temporary-unschedulable rule must catch Codex account-state phrases", { accountStatePhrase, accountState403Rule });
|
||||
assertCondition(quota429Keywords.has(accountStatePhrase), "429 temporary-unschedulable rule must catch Codex account-state phrases", { accountStatePhrase, quota429Rule });
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertCondition(successBody200Rule !== undefined, "200 temporary-unschedulable rule must be declared when YAML needs success-body reclassification", rules);
|
||||
if (successBody200Rule !== undefined) {
|
||||
assertCondition(successBody200Keywords.size === 1 && successBody200Keywords.has(successBodyPhrase), "200 temporary-unschedulable rule must use one stable success-body classifier phrase", successBody200Rule);
|
||||
assertCondition(/reclassification/u.test(successBody200Rule.description ?? ""), "200 temporary-unschedulable rule must be documented as a runtime reclassification requirement", successBody200Rule);
|
||||
@@ -118,6 +122,7 @@ console.log(JSON.stringify({
|
||||
"optional WebSocket mode overrides use supported values",
|
||||
"local Codex WebSocket transport is consistent with YAML-declared WSv2-capable accounts",
|
||||
"temporary unschedulable rules are structurally valid when enabled",
|
||||
"upstream 400 Responses compatibility and model-routing failures are caught by the 400 cooldown rule",
|
||||
"generic recovered upstream error wrappers are caught by cooldown rules",
|
||||
"large-context upstream failures are caught by the 413 cooldown rule",
|
||||
"gateway timeout wrappers are caught by the 504 cooldown rule",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user